# LC Tests
```agda
{-# OPTIONS --rewriting --confluence-check #-}
module Tests.LC where
open import Notation
open import Properties
open import Examples.LC.Abstract-Syntax
open import Examples.LC.Domain-Equations
open import Examples.LC.Semantic-Functions
check-id :
⟦ ⦅ ⦅λ x 1 ␣ var x 1 ⦆ ␣ var x 42 ⦆ ⟧ ≡ ⟦ var x 42 ⟧
check-id = refl
check-const :
⟦ ⦅ ⦅λ x 1 ␣ var x 42 ⦆ ␣ var x 0 ⦆ ⟧ ≡ ⟦ var x 42 ⟧
check-const = refl
check-convergence :
⟦ ⦅ ⦅λ x 1 ␣ var x 42 ⦆ ␣
⦅ ⦅λ x 0 ␣ ⦅ var x 0 ␣ var x 0 ⦆ ⦆ ␣ ⦅λ x 0 ␣ ⦅ var x 0 ␣ var x 0 ⦆ ⦆ ⦆ ⦆ ⟧ ≡ ⟦ var x 42 ⟧
check-convergence = refl
check-abs :
⟦ ⦅ ⦅λ x 1 ␣ var x 1 ⦆ ␣ ⦅λ x 1 ␣ var x 42 ⦆ ⦆ ⟧ ≡ ⟦ ⦅λ x 1 ␣ var x 42 ⦆ ⟧
check-abs = refl
check-free :
⟦ ⦅ ⦅λ x 1 ␣ ⦅ ⦅λ x 42 ␣ var x 1 ⦆ ␣ var x 2 ⦆ ⦆ ␣ var x 42 ⦆ ⟧ ≡ ⟦ var x 42 ⟧
check-free = refl
```
A reviewer pointed out that the only interpretation of `⟪ D∞ ⟫` in Agda could be a singleton type,
so that one should expect many equalities to hold.
However, when the proof of an equality is simply by `refl`,
Agda's type-checker does not automatically use such reasoning.